By 
A sports organization’s brand is often its most valuable asset – more durable than any single season, more transferable than any roster, and more commercially versatile than its venue or equipment. Logos, team names, color schemes, and the identities of the athletes who represent an organization all carry real economic weight. Protecting that weight requires more than a trademark filing and a handshake sponsorship deal. At Braslow Legal, we work with teams, athletes, and sports organizations on the specific legal structures that turn brand equity into enforceable, monetizable rights.
The legal landscape around sports branding has also shifted meaningfully in recent years. The NCAA’s name, image, and likeness rule changes opened a new commercial frontier for college athletes. State NIL laws vary considerably, and several remain unsettled. Professional leagues continue tightening their compliance and licensing frameworks. Organizations that understood brand protection as a passive concern are finding it requires active management.
The Trademark Foundation Every Sports Organization Needs
Registration is the starting point. A sports organization’s name, logo, and any distinctive wordmarks or design elements should be registered with the USPTO before they appear on merchandise, in advertising, or in any commercial context. Common law trademark rights exist without registration, but they’re limited to the geographic area where the mark is actively used. For an organization with regional reach or national ambitions, those limitations create real vulnerability.
Registration is also not a one-time event. Marks must be maintained through regular use and timely renewal filings. A registered trademark that isn’t renewed or that falls into non-use can be cancelled, opening the door for third parties to file conflicting marks. Organizations that license their marks to merchandise partners, apparel companies, or promotional sponsors also need monitoring systems to catch unauthorized uses before they become infringement problems – or worse, before a third party registers a confusingly similar mark that requires expensive opposition proceedings to challenge.
The merchandise and apparel categories deserve particular attention. Counterfeit sports merchandise is a persistent problem, and the financial impact on legitimate licensing revenue is significant. Recording a registered trademark with U.S. Customs and Border Protection allows CBP to detain and seize counterfeit goods at the border, which is a meaningful enforcement tool that many organizations overlook.
Licensing Agreements: Structuring Deals That Actually Protect You
A licensing agreement grants another party the right to use your intellectual property – your name, logo, marks, or image – under specific conditions. How those conditions are defined is where most licensing deals either protect the licensor or expose them.
Exclusivity is the first major negotiating point. An exclusive license in a given product category or territory prevents the organization from licensing those same rights to any other party for the duration of the agreement. Exclusive deals typically command higher royalties, but they also lock out competing revenue. Non-exclusive arrangements allow multiple licensees in the same category, which broadens reach but reduces leverage with any individual partner. The right structure depends on the organization’s commercial strategy and the specific market being addressed.
Royalty structures are equally consequential. Licensing agreements typically include a royalty rate applied to net sales, sometimes with a guaranteed minimum regardless of actual sales performance. Without a minimum guarantee, a licensee can sit on exclusive rights in a category while generating little revenue – effectively blocking more productive partnerships. Quality control provisions are also non-negotiable. The licensor needs contractual authority to approve how its marks appear on licensed products, reject substandard manufacturing, and terminate the agreement for quality failures. A poorly manufactured product bearing your team’s logo damages the brand regardless of who made it.
Digital and Gaming Rights: A Rapidly Expanding Category
Video game licensing, digital collectibles, and streaming rights have become significant revenue categories for sports organizations at every level. The legal frameworks governing these arrangements are still developing, and the contracts being written now will define rights for years. Organizations entering digital licensing deals should pay particular attention to how the agreement treats derivative works – content created using the licensed marks that takes on new forms, such as user-generated content in gaming environments or AI-generated imagery using official marks. Rights you don’t explicitly retain in the agreement may effectively be surrendered.
Athlete Endorsements and Image Rights: What the NIL Era Changed
The right of publicity – the legal protection against unauthorized commercial use of a person’s name, image, or likeness – sits at the center of every athlete endorsement deal. Florida has a right of publicity statute that provides meaningful protection, but the scope of that protection and how it interacts with league rules, collective bargaining agreements, and institutional policies varies depending on the athlete’s level of competition.
For professional athletes, endorsement arrangements typically operate within the constraints of the applicable collective bargaining agreement and league policies. Many leagues have group licensing arrangements where players’ associations collectively license members’ rights for certain categories – trading cards and video games being common examples – with individual deals covering everything else. Understanding what rights have already been licensed at the group level, and what remains available for individual negotiation, is essential groundwork before entering any endorsement agreement.
College athletes navigating NIL deals face a different set of constraints. Florida was among the first states to pass NIL legislation, and the state’s rules are relatively permissive, but institutional policies, conference rules, and the evolving NCAA framework create a layered compliance environment. An NIL agreement that complies with state law may still violate institutional policy or conference regulations, with consequences for eligibility that no endorsement fee is worth risking.
Sponsorship Agreements: Beyond the Check and the Logo Placement
Sponsorship agreements in sports are often treated as straightforward commercial arrangements: money in exchange for visibility. The actual legal document is considerably more complex, and what’s left unaddressed in the contract routinely becomes a source of disputes.
Activation rights define what the sponsor is allowed to do with the sponsorship beyond logo placement – whether they can use team marks in their own advertising, host events at the venue, feature athletes in promotional content, or distribute co-branded merchandise. Each of these represents a distinct right that should be explicitly granted or withheld in the agreement. Sponsors who assume broad activation rights based on a general sponsorship fee, and organizations that assume they’ve only sold signage, are both operating on expectations that the contract doesn’t support.
Morals clauses and termination provisions also deserve careful drafting. A sponsor’s brand can become a liability overnight due to events entirely outside the organization’s control, and organizations need clear contractual grounds to exit those relationships without litigation. The inverse applies as well: a sponsoring brand needs protection against association with an organization facing reputational damage from misconduct by team personnel or ownership.
Category Exclusivity and Competing Sponsor Conflicts
Category exclusivity guarantees that a sponsor’s direct competitors will not receive sponsorship rights in the same product or service category. These provisions are standard in professional sports but require careful definition. “Beverage” and “non-alcoholic beverage” are different categories. “Financial services” and “personal banking” are different categories. Loose drafting creates ambiguity that becomes a dispute when a second sponsor from an arguably adjacent category enters the picture.
League Compliance: The Layer Every Sports Deal Has to Account For
Every sponsorship, licensing, or endorsement deal involving a team or athlete affiliated with a league operates within that league’s regulatory framework. Leagues maintain detailed rules about approved sponsor categories, mandatory disclosure requirements, restrictions on competitor branding within venues, social media conduct, and the appearance of gambling-related advertising. Violating these rules through a privately negotiated deal can result in fines, forfeiture of revenue, or more serious disciplinary action.
Before any commercial agreement involving league-affiliated parties is finalized, the applicable league rules should be reviewed as part of the drafting process. This is not a formality – league compliance requirements have invalidated otherwise enforceable commercial deals, leaving parties with neither the benefit of the agreement nor a clean legal claim.
Working with Braslow Legal on Sports Brand Protection
The commercial value built into a sports brand is real, but it’s only as protected as the legal agreements and registrations that support it. Trademark filings that aren’t monitored lose their force. Licensing deals without quality controls and minimum guarantees underperform. Sponsorship agreements without precise activation and exclusivity language generate disputes that erode the value of the relationship.
Braslow Legal brings direct experience in sports and entertainment law to these specific challenges – not general business law applied to a sports context, but familiarity with the actual structures, the league frameworks, and the commercial realities that shape how these deals work. Whether you’re a team owner building out a sponsorship program, an athlete navigating NIL opportunities, or an organization reviewing its trademark portfolio, the work starts with a clear-eyed assessment of where the gaps are.
Reach out to Braslow Legal to schedule a consultation and find out what protecting your sports brand actually requires.
Comments